No one is taking anything here as a personal insult outside of your own mind. More likely than not they simply think your effort doesn't count for much as gaming on Linux is stellar out of the box.

Yup, I added the FUTO repo some time ago and that has it. Thanks!

I found it there.

Starting early summer 2025, we’ll be building more personal experiences for you.

Let's just keep it professional Fintech. Thanks for the post OP.

'tis but a joke. I'm still learning Rust, and really appreciate the borrow checker.

cries into the chest of the borrow checker

You're so close and yet: Whoosh

I'm just going to shove these words into your mouth because I cannot grasp the obvious.

Ah, the misogynistic punching bag that the left and right share. How noble it must feel to attempt to shout her down.

More reasons to not give AAA corporations my money? Cool, cool.

A-fucking-men.

Thanks for the direct link, this is a great little time waster.

Being decent is too far to the right for the Tankie class to stomach. Duly noted.

These posts are doing a little more than providing your agitprop a space to die by a thousand cuts. Adults don't get "worked up" over taking out the trash.

I think that the team working on the DLC did the best they could with what time and resources they were given, which isn’t a stretch to guess wasn’t enough,” ROR2 lead programmer, co-designer, and concept artist Jeffrey Hunt told PCGamesN. “I remember the team at Gearbox we worked with on the Survivors of the Void DLC was doing really well, particularly on the new stages.” Still, Hunt said, “Seeing some of the rushed changes crippling that work is difficult.

"Right direction" my ass.

If they think this is bad, just wait until the tools to make games are further democratized. It's already difficult to stay up with the latest hotness in the Indie scene and people are burned out on live service shenanigans.

I'd never posit that all reviewers are pandering to large publishers, but rather that the majority have absolutely seen score creep that now rewards mediocrity with 7/10 in order to maintain access. This is why I unapologetically turn to a more trusted source first.

It absolutely is. Not to whinge over the state of the gaming press as I'm not one of those guys, but with that said I personally stack weight behind EG's reviews before looking elsewhere. Not to say that they are the best/most objective in their field, but rather that they are consistent and don't seem to pander to publishers. Happy to hear of any other sites that leave others feeling the same.

..and to be honest, after reading a bit more the game doesn't look bad, only middling.

Eurogamer - 2/5 Stars - "Stripped-back Ubisoft formula is admirable yet doomed"

Shocker.

Edit: Apologies for starting this off negative. I'm just tired of Ubisoft and AAA in general and didn't intend to knock the shine off of something that some folks are looking forward to.

Had your game on my wishlist and was giving it a close look, went ahead and picked it up based on the strength of being a fellow Lemmy poster. I'll be sure to leave a review after putting some time in, best of luck.