can 2h ago • 100%
I don't think they know how spoiler alerts work.
can 3h ago • 100%
Ridiculous when they were already known for *catalog shopping
can 5h ago • 100%
Thought it was a record based on the thumbnail.
can 5h ago • 100%
Until the fire alarm cries out in pain
can 6h ago • 100%
If google heads that way I'll head somewhere else.
can 7h ago • 100%
They said Republicans had been saying they would ban abortion for years, and never thought they'd actually do it.
I wonder how many are causally gambling on Americans' freedom every 4 years?
can 1d ago • 100%
then the problem is clearly you
Or maybe it's the education system, or health care system, or
This was a community I enjoyed from the other place but I don't have much material to grow it and I have other communities to focus on. Would anyone be interested in looking after it? Edit: to be clear there's no requirement to actively grow it if you can't, just watching out for spam would be enough to keep this place from potential deletion.
can 2d ago • 100%
and how to guess the geographic origin of rappers.
Do tell
can 2d ago • 100%
A lot of people on Lemmy were upset when a bunch of people on Reddit joined
How many active users were there pre API fisaco? Fedidb graph doesn't go back that far.
can 2d ago • 83%
I'm wondering the same thing. I never really used Twitter, couldn't people just stalk without being logged in? Or was this to weed out the least motivated stalkers?
can 2d ago • 100%
You make a frighteningly good point.
can 3d ago • 100%
The secret is actually money.
I haven't used the app in a while but I'm looking for a new one.
>A YouTube poop (YTP) is a type of video mashup or edit created by remixing/editing pre-existing media sources, often carrying subcultural significance into a new video for humorous, vulgar, satirical, obscene, absurd, profane, annoying, confusing, or dramatic purposes. YouTube poops are traditionally uploaded to the video sharing website YouTube, hence the name.
Feeling nostalgic. 30 mins in flash with no seekbar
www.techdirt.com
>Swift’s long battle is well-known in the industry. But an article on the Harvard Law Today site from a few months back adds an important detail to this story that I have not seen reported anywhere else. It draws on comments made by Gary R. Greenstein, a “technology transactions partner” at Wilson Sonsini, one of the top US law firms. It concerns a common legal requirement in contracts to wait a certain number of years before artists are allowed to re-record an album:
>Should the user of the code consider the software useful, they are encouraged to buy the author a beer "in return" if they ever meet. Not to be confused with ["free as in beer"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre) software