rambling_lunatic 4d ago • 100%
I missed the NG era as a young lad. Would you please elaborate?
rambling_lunatic 5d ago • 100%
*cognitohazard unless it is contagious
rambling_lunatic 6d ago • 100%
To be fair, the name Antifa is used pretty much exclusively by radical anti-authoritarian left groups.
The libs don't organise into black blocs to beat up fascists, they write to their congressman to ask for stricter hate speech laws.
The tankies, despite creating the first group to call itself AFA, don't participate in them much in the modern day because they try to subordinate such things to their party, which goes against the decentralized ethos of what most people call Antifa.
This leaves anarchists, libcoms, and a small smattering of demsocs and Trots. Thus it is completely fair to refer to "Antifa" as a left-wing phenomenon.
rambling_lunatic 7d ago • 100%
We do. DB0 and Solarpunk.
rambling_lunatic 7d ago • 50%
Maybe I'm just bitter that my city doesn't have a proper metro. I'm still fairly grateful though. My home town had no public transportation at all.
rambling_lunatic 7d ago • 50%
Embrace trams, the worst of all worlds
rambling_lunatic 1w ago • 100%
Polytheists are theists too
rambling_lunatic 1w ago • 100%
Literal IT Crowd episode plot
rambling_lunatic 2w ago • 81%
Don't worry, he'll return 2 Lemmy soon.
rambling_lunatic 3w ago • 99%
A friend and I were recently discussing how spineless modern boycotts are.
We set a goddamn deadline for when the Reddit boycott ended. No wonder Spez just waited. Most people then just continued using the website. What a disgrace.
Imagine if after one week of the genocide in Gaza, the BDS efforts just stopped. A boycott must be indefinite. It should go on until demands are met.
rambling_lunatic 3w ago • 100%
rambling_lunatic 4w ago • 100%
Read my post again. I'm not asking about the shining glorious utopia we're building. I'm asking about now.
rambling_lunatic 4w ago • 100%
Reasonable idea. Thank you.
rambling_lunatic 4w ago • 100%
Fair
rambling_lunatic 4w ago • 100%
Not much, but I am aware that some of it had to do with psychiatry.
rambling_lunatic 4w ago • 100%
Not really incarcerated, per se. And only a subset of the dangerous people.
If someone commits murder in a fit of rage and regrets it afterwards, they would not need any obligation or coercion to undergo psychiatric treatment.
We anarchists are generally averse to cooperating with the police, for very good reasons. However, as I understand it, at times the only real way to protect the community in the society we currently live in seems to be talking with the pigs. Suppose you believe yourself to have evidence incriminating a serial killer. In an anarchistic society the serial killer could be sent to the psych ward and dealt with humanely. But what about the modern day? Do you turn over the evidence to the police? This question has been bothering me for about 3 days now. It was provoked by learning about Aufhebengate. It made me wonder under what circumstances snitching is justifiable.
Note: I do not endorse Spenglerite historiography.
Text appears to be scanned. Scanning leaves much to be desired. Text itself is good.
Translation: At Duartians United [name of the account] we propose a law that sterilizes every foreign woman that has a baby in the Dominican Republic after her first birth in the country. This measure will only apply to foreigners and not Dominicans. Do you think that some lawmaker of the DR... The grim reality is that most people here think like this person.