Just to be clear, it’s not like the bank explicitly says “yeah, we’ll hide your money for x%”

Banks make money on fees, active management of investments, etc.

The entire issue is that half the country wants to gerrymander and the other half wants to take the high ground, kneecapping their own progress

This isn’t payments for votes though

Looking past how poorly written it is, it's just a naive idea.

What kind of flowers are we talking about?

Z

I was pretty drunk but it was okay ig

Nothing like now though. There’s a clear difference. He would pivot, but now he seems lost

Republicans don’t do that in public

I think it was before August that I started hearing about how he would change his train of thought mid-sentence and shit like that

Huh?

I think the idea from the article was that all the info in the profile had been previously breached and leaked, so anyone could have made the profile

I think the more important question is “why is that relevant?”

I don’t introduce myself with random facts about my past. “Hi, I once kissed a man on a dare”. That’s not relevant.

Roger Goodell: we can’t have kickoffs, that’ll ruin the game!

Also Roger Goodell: why shouldn’t commentators on a major station have a financial interest in specific teams?

8 hours? lol he’ll probably stand there for a minute, accidentally touch the wrong thing, and walk away with a burn

Been more than a month but it’s more visible now that it’s not a ”both sides” issue

Untrue. I mean, accordiong to your year and a half old article, sure. But again, in 3 minutes on Google I found plenty about Walgreens selling it

I’m not seeing anything that says Rite-Aid sells it in states with a ban. Not in your article or anywhere else (in 3 minutes of trying to google it)

Nobody has used the word “ban” though

It’s not like the article is a ringing endorsement of the product. I thought the best parts were where it pointed out how bad and overly priced it is