I admittedly didn’t read the article. Is that the reason or does someone already have an app called X? Either way they can just call it like “X - Formerly known as Twitter” but he’s probably too childish to do that.

There’s not a lot of reason to hate it if implemented correctly which it very well might not be at first and likely will cause some headaches. Regardless, Apple should also do a better job of telling users the reasons too if they are going to be doing this.

Right now, you fill out a whole bit of information about why your app might use specific private info, but Apple only shows minor information about it to the user. I’d much rather the user know the specific reason I’m using, for example, location instead of just for “App Functionality”. Would make a better user-developer relationship in my opinion and promote good transparency.

One more test reply

Test reply

Test comment - with an edit

Test edit

Sorry I’m not 100% sure about this, but is it possible to do it with Lemmy in the PWA? If so I’ll add it. Not able to look it up ATM though.

Shouldn’t it look like that?

But lol alright yea that’s bad. I’ll work on it.

If a JWT token was stolen 2FA wouldn’t matter.

You got a Snapchat screenshot? I got…let’s just say it was two older gentlemen having some fun

Oh nothing happened. I have an account on .ml that I usually use but it's been acting super slow all day long. Just something us refugees have to deal with 🦾

There are some options for font size, font weight, etc. inside of the settings.

Hey all. Replying from .world since...well you guys know.

Anyway, thank you for all your support over the past weeks. It's helped us get to this point.

A word of caution: The build that was released is slightly outdated and there are a few issues that have already been addressed in that build. Unfortunately because you can't replace the build in review, we were not able to update it as we went through this nearly week-long back and forth with Apple. It required an appeal to get us onto the store.

With that said, I'll be releasing the final version of 0.0.2 tonight to TestFlight, and will begin build versioning starting at 0.1.0, which will be the next release on the store. I'll try and have something submitted to them tonight and hopefully it will be reviewed and released within a day or so.

Cheers!

Test reply.

Doesn’t help that the articles often have click bait titles for this reason. There was also an issue I came across last month with a Redis vulnerability where there was some leaked information, so that probably made it more confusing.

All good 🖖

Unless I’m missing something, those citations all talk about malware (specifically Raccoon it seems in most cases). The title “ChatGPT Hacked” implies that there was a data breach on OpenAIs side which doesn’t seem to be the case.

This would be the equivalent of saying Netflix was hacked whenever people start leaking premium Netflix accounts after they get stolen by a keylogger.

No problem, I’m about to fire mine up as well! Let’s enjoy some food 👍👍

This was not a hack. The information was stolen from individual users using malware. Misleading title.

Don’t worry I got you guys today 👍

I’ll do this in next update. Sorry for delay on getting it done, been focusing on some other things. I was a little reluctant to do it because it was only available in .18, but it seems most have upgraded now so it shouldn’t be an issue.

I’ll do this in next update. Sorry for delay on getting it done, been focusing on some other things.